Name:
حماد بن أسامة بن زيد القرشى مولاهم ، أبو أسامة الكوفى ، مولى بنى هاشم
( قاله البخارى ) و قيل مولى زيد بن على
Hammaad
bin Usaamah bin Zayd al-Qurashi, their client, Abu Usaamah al-Koofi, Mawla
Bani Haashim and it is said he is the client of Zayd bin Ali
Tabaqah:
9 - From the minor Taba Taabi'een
Death: 201
H in Koofah
Narrated by:
Al-Bukhaari –
Muslim –
Abu Dawood –
Tirmidhi –
Nasaa'ee –
Ibn Maajah
Teachers: Abu
Ishaaq Ibraaheem bin Muhammad al-Fazaari, Al-Ajlah bin Abdullah al-Kindi,
Al-Ahwas bin Hakeem ash-Shaami, Idrees bin Yazeed al-Awdi, Usaamah bin Zayd
al-Laythi, Israa’eel bin Yoonus, Ismaa’eel bin Abi Khaalid, Bishr bin Khaalid
al-Koofi, Habeeb bin ash-Shaheed, Al-Hasan bin al-Hakam al-Nakha’ee, Husayn bin
Zakwaan al-Mu’allam, Hammaad bin Zayd, Zaa’idah bin Qudaamah, Zakariyyah bin
Abi Zaa’idah, Sa’eed bin Abi Aroobah, Sufyaan ath-Thawree, Sufyaan bin Uyaynah,
Sulemaan al-A’mash, Shareek bin Abdullah al-Nakha’ee, Shu’bah bin al-Hajjaaj,
Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Umar bin Ali bin Abi Taalib, Abdur Rahmaan bin Abi az-Zinaad,
Abdur Razzaaq bin Hammaam as-Sana’aani, Abdul Azeez bin Umar bin Abdul Azeez,
Abdul Malik bin Jurayj, Uthmaan bin Ghiyaath, Abu Sinaan Eesaa bin Sinaan, Mis’ar
bin Kidaam, Hishaam bin Hassaan, Hishaam bin Urwah, Waleed bin Katheer,
Abdullah bin al-Mubaarak and others.
Students: Ibraaheem
bin Sa’eed al-Johari, Ahmed bin Ibraaheem ad-Dauraqi, Ahmed bin Sinaan
al-Qattaan al-Waasiti, Ahmed bin Muhammad bin Hanbal, Ishaaq bin Rahwayh,
Ishaaq bin Mansoor al-Kausaj, Zakariyyah bin Yahya al-Balkhi, Abu Khaythamah
Zuhayr bin Harb, Sa’eed bin Sulemaan al-Waasiti, Sufyaan bin Wakee’ bin
al-Jarraah, Abdullah bin al-Jarraah, Abdullah bin az-Zubayr al-Humaydee, Abu Sa’eed
al-Ashaj, Abu Bakr Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Abi Shaybah, Abdullah bin Muhammad
al-Musnadi, Abdur Rahmaan bin Ibraaheem Duhaym, Abdur Rahmaan bin Mahdi,
Uthmaan bin Muhammad bin Abi Shaybah, Ali bin al-Madeeni, Qutaybah bin Sa’eed,
Muhammad bin Idrees ash-Shaafi’ee, Muhammad bin Abdullah bin al-Mubaarak,
Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Numayr, Yahya bin Ma’een, Ya’qoob bin Ibraaheem
ad-Dauraqi and others.
Status:
Thiqah Thabat, and he is not a Mudallis
Opinions of Ahl ul-Jarh wat Ta’deel:
Those who praised him:
1-
Imaam
Muhammad bin Sa’d (D. 230) said:
“وَكَانَ
ثِقَةً مَأْمُونًا كَثِيرَ الْحَدِيثِ, يُدَلِّسُ وَيبَيَّنَ تَدْلِيسُهُ وَكَانَ
صَاحِبَ سُنَّةٍ وَجَمَاعَةٍ”
“He was Thiqah Ma’moon Katheer ul-Hadeeth, he commits Tadlees
and he has showed/clarified his tadlees, and he was a man of Sunnah and Jama’ah”
[
Tabaqaat al-Kubra by Ibn Sa'd (6/394-395) ]
Note:
The discussion on his Tadlees is coming ahead, in-shaa-Allaah.
2-
Imaam
Yahya bin Ma’een (D. 233) was asked who is more beloved to you Abu
Usaamah or Abu Abdah, so he said:
“ما منهما إلا ثقة”
“There is nothing in both of them except reliability”
[
Taareekh Ibn Ma'een, narrated by ad-Daarimi (# 242) ]
3-
Imaam
Ahmed bin Hanbal (D. 241) said:
“كان ثبتًا لا يكاد يخطىء”
“He was Thabat and he hardly ever made mistakes”
[
Al-Ilal wa Ma'rifat ur-Rijaal by Ahmed, narrated by Abdullah (745) ]
At another
place, his son Abdullah asked him about Abu Usaamah and Abu Aasim as to which
of them is more Thabat in Hadeeth? So he replied:
“أبو
أسامة أثبت من مئه مثل أبي عاصم... كان أبو أسامة ثبتًا صحيح الكتاب”
“Abu Usaamah is hundred times
more Thabat than the likes of Abu Aasim…. Abu Usaamah was Thabat (&) Saheeh
ul-Kitaab”
[Al-Ilal (772 & 5980)]
Imaam Ahmed
said that Abu Usaamah said:
“كتبت
بيدي مئة ألف حديث”
“I have written hundred
thousand narrations with my hands”
[Al-Ilal (5397)]
4-
Imaam
Muhammad bin Ismaa’eel al-Bukhaari (D. 256) narrated and took evidence
from him in his Saheeh.
5-
Imaam
Abu al-Hasan al-Ijlee (D. 261) said:
“ثقة، وكان يعد من حكماء أصحاب الحديث”
“He was Thiqah and he was counted among the elders of the people
of Hadeeth (i.e. Ahl al-Hadeeth)”
[
Ath-Thiqaat by al-Ijlee (1/130) ]
6-
Imaam
Muslim bin al-Hajjaaj al-Neesaaboori (D. 261) narrated and took
evidence from him in his Saheeh
7-
Imaam
Ibn Khuzaymah (D. 311) narrated from him in his Saheeh
8-
Imaam
Ibn Hibbaan (D. 354) narrated from him in his Saheeh, and he mentioned
him in his Kitaab ath-Thiqaat (# 7453)
9-
Imaam
Ibn Abi Haatim ar-Raazi (D. 327) said:
“حَمَّادِ بنِ أُسَامةَ الكُوفيِّ أحدِ الثقاتِ”
“Hammaad bin Usaamah al-Koofi is one of the Thiqah narrators”
[
Al-Ilal by Ibn Abi Haatim (1/55) ]
10-
Imaam
Abu Abdullah al-Haakim al-Neesaaboori (D. 405) authenticated his
narrations saying:
“هَذَا حَدِيثٌ صَحِيحٌ عَلَى شَرْطِ الشَّيْخَيْنِ”
“This hadeeth is Saheeh upon the conditions of Shaykhayn”
[
Al-Mustadrak Ala as-Saheehayn by al-Haakim (H. 1408, 1280, 4402) ]
11-
Imaam
Abu al-Hasan ad-Daaraqutni (D. 385) said:
“ثقة”
“Thiqah”
[
Al-Ilal by Ad-Daaraqutni ]
At another
place, he said:
“ثقة
حافظ”
“Thiqah Haafidh”
[Al-Ilal with reference to Mawsoo’ah Aqwaal ad-Daaraqutni (1/225)]
12-
Imaam
Shams ud-Deen adh-Dhahabi (D. 748) said:
“الحَافِظُ، الثَّبْتُ”
“Al-Haafidh ath-Thabat”
[
Siyar A’laam al-Nabula (9/277) ]
13-
Haafidh
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani (D. 852) said:
“ثقة ثبت”
“Thiqah Thabat”
[
Taqreeb at-Tahdheeb ]
And many
others have declared Thiqah! In fact there is consensus on his Thaqaahat and
Faqaahat.
Those who criticized him:
After the Tawtheeq of Jumhoor,
the Jarh of Sufyaan
bin Wakee’ (Weak) and Abu al-Fath al-Azdi (Weak) etc is not harmful.
Hammaad bin Usaamah and
Tadlees
1- Abu al-Fath al-Azdi narrated from Al-Mu’eeti that he said:
“كان
كثير التدليس ثم بعد تركه”
“He was Katheer ut-Tadlees
then he abandoned it”
[Al-Mudalliseen by Ibn al-Iraaqi (1/46), Tabaqaat
al-Mudalliseen by Ibn Hajar (1/30), etc]
Note:
This saying is weak as Abu al-Fath al-Azdi is weak and accused of fabricating
hadeeth.
2- Imaam Ibn Sa’d said:
“وَكَانَ
ثِقَةً مَأْمُونًا كَثِيرَ الْحَدِيثِ, يُدَلِّسُ وَيبَيَّنَ تَدْلِيسُهُ وَكَانَ
صَاحِبَ سُنَّةٍ وَجَمَاعَةٍ”
“He was Thiqah Ma’moon Katheer ul-Hadeeth, he commits Tadlees
and he has showed/clarified his tadlees, and he was a man of Sunnah and Jama’ah”
[
Tabaqaat al-Kubra by Ibn Sa'd (6/394-395) ]
Note: There
is nothing proven about his Tadlees other than this saying of Ibn Sa’d and this
saying of Ibn Sa’d proves that his ‘An’ana is mahmoolah ala as-samaa and that
he is not a Mudallis because the one whose tadlees is shown (as to whom he did
the tadlees from) then it is not said about him that he is a Mudallis,
therefore, he is free from Tadlees.
[See, Fath
al-Mubeen by Shaykh Zubayr Ali Za’ee (P. 38)]
Conclusion:
Imaam Hammaad bin Usaamah is
Thiqah Thabat Faqeeh.