Pages

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir ad-Dimashqi




Name:

عبد الرحمن بن يزيد بن جابر الأزدى ، أبو عتبة السلمى الشامى الدمشقى الدارانى ( أخو يزيد بن يزيد بن جابر و والد عبد الله )

Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir al-Azdi, Abu Utbah as-Sulami ash-Shaami ad-Dimashqi ad-Daaraani (The Brother of Yazeed bin Yazeed bin Jaabir and the Father of Abdullah)

Tabaqah: 7 – From the Major Taba’ Taabi’een

Death: 150 and some H

Narrated by: Al-Bukhaari – Muslim – Abu Dawood – Tirmidhi – Nasaa’ee – Ibn Maajah

Teachers: Abu Salaam al-Aswad, Abu al-Asha’th as-Sana’aani, Makhool, Abdullah bin Aamir al-Yahsubi, Ibn Shihaab az-Zuhri, Abu Kabshah as-Salooli, Atiyyah bin Qays and others.

Students: His son Abdullah, Waleed bin Muslim, Abdullah bin al-Mubaarak, Umar bin Abdul Waahid, Muhammad bin Shaaboor, Ayyoob bin Suwayd, Husayn al-Ju’fi, and others.

Status: Thiqah Thabat

Opinions of Ahl ul-Jarh wat Ta’deel:

Those who praised him:

1-    Imaam Yahya ibn Ma’een said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir, Abu Bakr bin Abi Maryam, and Hareez bin Uthmaan ar-Rahbi are all Thiqaat”
[Su’aalaat Ibn al-Junayd: 1/399 T. 531]

Ishaaq bin Mansoor al-Kausaj narrated from Imaam Yahya ibn Ma’een that he said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir is Thiqah”
[Al-Jarh wat Ta’deel: 5/300]

Imaam Ibn Ma’een also said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir is elder than his brother Yazeed bin Yazeed bin Jaabir”
[Taareekh Ibn Ma’een, narrated by ad-Dauri: 4/430]

Ibn Ma’een also said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir and his brother Yazeed bin Yazeed bin Jaabir both are Thiqah”
[Taareekh Ibn Ma’een, narrated by ad-Dauri: 4/456]

2-    Imaam Ahmed bin Hanbal said: “Safwaan bin Amr and Ibn Jaabir i.e. Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir are both Thiqah”
[Su’aalaat Abu Dawood lil Imaam Ahmed: 1/257 T. 277]

3-    Imaam Moosa bin Haaroon said: “Ibn Jaabir is Thiqah”
[Taareekh Baghdaad: 10/210]

4-    Imaam Muhammad bin Ismaa’eel al-Bukhaari narrated from him in his Saheeh
[See, Saheeh al-Bukhaari: H. 1945, 5590]

5-    Imaam Abu Haatim ar-Raazi said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir is Sadooq, there is nothing wrong in him”
[Al-Jarh wat Ta’deel by Ibn Abi Haatim: 1/257 T. 277]

Imaam Abu Haatim also said: “He is Thiqah”
[Ilal al-Hadeeth by Ibn Abi Haatim: 565]

6-    Imaam Muslim bin al-Hajjaaj narrated from him in his Saheeh
[See, Saheeh Muslim: H. 104, 1847, 1855, 1924, 2937]

7-    Imaam Ya’qoob bin Sufyaan said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed and Yazeed bin Yazeed both are Thiqah”
[Al-Ma’rifah wal Taareekh: 2/453]

8-    Imaam Muhammad bin Sa’d said: “He is Thiqah”
[Tabaqaat al-Kubra: 7/323]

9-    Imaam al-Ijlee said: “He is Thiqah”
[Thiqaat by al-Ijlee: 1/300]

10-          Imaam Abu Hafs Ibn Shaaheen mentioned him in ath-Thiqaat and said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir and he is the brother of Yazeed bin Jaabir; both are Thiqah”
[Taareekh Asmaa ath-Thiqaat: 1/145 T. 792]

11-          Imaam Ibn Khuzaymah narrated from him in his Saheeh
[See, Saheeh Ibn Khuzaymah: H. 534, 793, 1734, 1758 etc]

12-          Imaam Abu Awaanah narrated from him in his Saheeh
[Mustakhraj Abu Awaanah Ala Saheeh Muslim: H. 154, 1180, 6736, 7167, 7183, 7495, 7501 etc]

13-          Imaam Ibn Hibbaan mentioned him in ath-Thiqaat
[7/81 T. 9098]

Imaam Ibn Hibbaan also narrated from him in his Saheeh
[See, Saheeh Ibn Hibbaan: H. 545, 910, 943, 2320, 2324, 2899, 3152, 3394, 4767, 7330]

14-          Imaam al-Bazzaar said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir is Thiqah”
[Musnad al-Bazzaar: 8/411]

15-          Imaam Abu Abdullah al-Haakim al-Neesaaboori authenticated many of his ahaadeeth saying, “Its chain is Saheeh”
[Mustadrak al-Haakim: H. 12771885… etc]

He also authenticated many of his ahaadeeth to be on the conditions of Bukhaari and Muslim
[See, H. 1029, 1568, 1926… etc]

16-          Haafidh al-Busayri authenticated one of his hadeeth saying, “The narrators of this chain are all Thiqaat”
[Itthaaf al-Khayrah: 2/92 H. 1099; Also see, Misbaah uz-Zajaajah: 2/41, 2/46, 3/144, 4/235]

17-          Haafidh Ibn al-Qattaan al-Faasi said: “This (person) is Thiqah”
[Bayaan al-Wahem: 5/575]

18-          Imaam Dhahabi said: “He is one of the Thiqah Ulama”
[Meezaan al-I’tidaal: Vol. 2 T. 5007; Also See, al-Kaashif (1/648)]

19-          Haafidh Ibn al-Mulaqqin authenticated one of his hadeeth saying, “The narrators of this chain are all Thiqaat”
[Al-Badar al-Muneer: 7/265]

20-          Haafidh Ibn Katheer said: “And Ibn Asaakir narrated with a chain containing all Thiqah narrators from Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir….”
[Al-Bidaayah wal Nihaayah: 9/183 – Pub: Daar Ihyaa]

21-          Haafidh Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani said: “He is Thiqah”
[Taqreeb: 4041]

Ibn Hajar also said: “He is one of the Thiqah Thabat people; the Jumhoor has declared him Thiqah”
[Fath ul-Baari: 1/419]

Those who criticized him:

1-    Imaam Abu Hafs Amr bin Ali al-Fallaas said: “Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir is Da’eef ul-Hadeeth, he narrated Munkar narrations from Makhool, and he is from the people of truth according to them, and the people of Koofah narrated Munkar narrations from him”
[Taareekh Baghdaad: 10/210]

Note: Imaam Khateeb Baghdaadi has refuted this Jarh explaining that there are two people with similar names, one is Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Tameem and the other is Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir. The people of Koofah narrated from Ibn Tameem and they erred in differentiating between the two. Therefore, this Jarh of Imaam al-Fallaas is in reality intended for Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Tameem. Imaam Khateeb also said that there is no Munkar narration narrated by Ibn Jaabir
[Taareekh Baghdaad: 10/210]

Imaam Bukhaari said: “The people of Koofah narrated Munkar narrations from Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir, and according to me they only intended Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Tameem by it, who is Munkar al-Hadeeth, (because) he resembles Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir with his ahaadeeth”
[Tarteeb Ilal at-Tirmidhi al-Kabeer: P. 76]

Conclusion:

Abdur Rahmaan bin Yazeed bin Jaabir is Thiqah by consensus.

Abdur Rahmaan bin Sulemaan bin Abdullah bin Handhalah al-Ansaari




Name:

عَبْد الرَّحْمَن بن سُلَيْمان بن عَبد اللَّه بن حنظلة الأَنْصارِيّ الأوسي ، أَبُو سُلَيْمان المدني المعروف بابن الغسيل.

Abdur Rahmaan bin Sulemaan bin Abdullah bin Handhalah al-Ansaari al-Awsi, Abu Sulemaan al-Madani, Famous as: Ibn al-Ghaseel

Birth: 66 H

Tabaqah: 6 – From the contemporaries of Minor Taabi’een

Death: 172 H

Narrated by: Bukhaari – Muslim – Abu Dawood – Tirmidhi in al-Shumayal – Ibn Maajah

Teachers: Ikrimah, Aseed bin Ali bin Ubayd, Al-Mundhir bin Abi Usayd as-Saa’idi, Abbaas bin Sahl, Aasim bin Umar bin Qataadah, and a group

Students: Wakee’ bin al-Jarraah, Abu Ahmed az-Zubayri, Abu Nu’aym al-Fadl bin Dukayn, Abu al-Waleed at-Tiyaalsi, Yahya bin Abdul Humayd al-Himmaani, Ahmed bin Ya’qoob al-Mas’oodi, Ibraaheem bin Abi al-Wazeer, Muhammad bin Abdul Waahib, Jubaarah bin al-Mughallis, and others.

Status: Thiqah

Opinions of Ahl ul-Jarh wat Ta’deel:

Those who praised him:

1-    Imaam Yahya ibn Ma’een said: “He is Thiqah; There is nothing wrong in him”
[Taareekh ad-Dauri: 2/349; al-Jarh wat Ta’deel: 5/239]

2-    Imaam Bukhaari narrated from him in his Saheeh
[Saheeh Bukhaari: H. 2900, 3628, 3984, 3985, 5683, 5704, 6438 etc]

3-    Imaam Muslim narrated from him in his Saheeh
[Saheeh Muslim: H. 2205]

4-    Imaam Abu Zur’ah ar-Raazi said: “He is Koofi Thiqah”
[Al-Jarh wat Ta’deel: 5/239]

5-    Imaam Ibn Hibbaan mentioned him in ath-Thiqaat
[5/85 T. 3968]

6-    Imaam Ibn Shaaheen mentioned him in ath-Thiqaat
[T. 783]

7-    Imaam Ibn Adee said: “He is among those who narrations are relied upon and written down”
[Al-Kaamil: 5/465]

8-    Imaam ad-Daaraqutni said: “He is Thiqah”
[Al-Mu’talaf wal Mukhtalaf: 3/1734]

9-    Imaam al-Haakim authenticated his hadeeth, saying: “Its chain is Saheeh”
[Mustadrak al-Haakim: H. 6971, 7260]

10-          Haafidh al-Baghawi authenticated his hadeeth
[See, Sharh us-Sunnah: 12/143, 14/178]

11-          Haafidh Ibn al-Qattaan al-Faasi said: “He is Thiqah”
[Bayaan al-Wahem wal Ayhaam: 4/662]

12-          Imaam Dhahabi said: “He is Katheer ul-Hadeeth Thiqah Jaleel”
[Al-Abar: 1/201]

He also said: “He is Sadooq”
[Al-Kaashif: 1/630]

Dhahabi also mentioned him in “Man Takallam Feehi Wahuwa Mawthaq”
[1/120 T. 210]

13-          Haafidh Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani said: “He is Sadooq, there is leniency in him”
[Taqreeb: 3887]

Ibn Hajar also said: “And he is Thiqah according to the Majority (Akthar)”
[Fath ul-Baari: 10/140 under H. 5683]

Note:
·        Mughaltaa’ee al-Hanafi authenticated one of his hadeeth saying, “Its chain is Saheeh”
[Sharh Sunan Ibn Maajah: 1/1262]

Those who criticized him:

1-    Imaam an-Nasaa’ee said: “He is not strong”
[Al-Kaamil: 5/463 T. 1110]

2-    Imaam Ibn Hibbaan also mentioned him in al-Majroheen and said: “Despite the sincerity in him, he is among those who err and make a lot of mistakes…”
[2/57 T. 597]

3-    Imaam al-Ukaylee mentioned him in ad-Du’afa
[P. 117]

4-    Haafidh Ibn al-Jawzee mentioned him in ad-Du’afa
[P. 94]

Conclusion:

Abdur Rahmaan bin al-Ghaseel is Thiqah according to the Jumhoor.

Abdul Humayd bin Habeeb bin Abi al-Ishrayn




Name:
عبد الحميد بن حبيب بن أبى العشرين الشامى ، أبو سعيد الدمشقى البيروتى ( كاتب الأوزاعى )

Abdul Humayd bin Habeeb bin Abi al-Ishrayn ash-Shaami, Abu Sa’eed ad-Dimashqi al-Bayrooti (the scribe of al-Awzaa’ee)

Tabaqah: 9 – From the Minor Taba Taabi’een

Narrated by: Al-Bukhaari in Ta’leeq form – Tirmidhi – Ibn Maajah

Teacher: Imaam Abdur Rahmaan bin Amr al-Awzaa’ee

Students: Hishaam bin Ammaar, Wassaaj bin Uqbah bin Wassaaj, Yahya bin Abi al-Khusayb, Abu al-Jumaahir Muhammad bin Uthmaan at-Tanookhi, and Junaadah bin Muhammad bin Abi Yahya al-Murri

Status: Thiqah

Opinions of Ahl ul-Jarh wat Ta’deel:

Those who praised him:

1-    Imaam Ahmed bin Muhammad bin Hanbal said: “He is Thiqah”
[Al-Jarh wat Ta’deel: Vol. 6 T. 49, Chain Saheeh]

2-    Imaam Yahya ibn Ma’een said: “There is nothing wrong in him”
[Su’aalaat Ibn al-Junayd: 10]

3-    Imaam Abu Zur’ah ar-Raazi said: “He is Thiqah; his hadeeth is Mustaqeem, and he is counted among the companions of Al-Awzaa’ee”
[Al-Jarh wat Ta’deel: Vol. 6 T. 49]

4-    Imaam Ahmed bin Abdullah al-Ijlee said: “There is nothing wrong in him”
[Ath-Thiqaat: P. 32]

5-    Imaam Abu Ahmed bin Adee al-Jarjaani said: “He is among those whose narrations are written down”
[Al-Kaamil: 7/12]

6-    Imaam Abu Bakr al-Bazzaar said: “Abdul Humayd: There is nothing wrong in him”
[Musnad al-Bazzaar: 14/233 H. 7801]

7-    Imaam Ibn Hibbaan mentioned him in ath-Thiqaat
[7/122 T. 9280]

Imaam Ibn Hibbaan also narrated from him in his Saheeh
[See, Saheeh Ibn Hibbaan: H. 1, 919, 1888, 3592, 7438]

At another place he said: “He sometimes errs”
[Same: 8/400 T. 14083]

8-    Imaam ad-Daaraqutni said: “He is Thiqah”
[Su’aalaat al-Haakim li’d-Daaraqutni: 1/241 T. 396]

9-    Imaam al-Haakim authenticated his hadeeth saying, “Its chain is Saheeh”
[Mustadrak al-Haakim: H. 836]

10-          Haafidh Abdul Haqq al-Ashbaylee said: “He is Thiqah”
[Al-Ahkaam al-Kubra: 3/340]

11-          Haafidh Ibn al-Qattaan al-Faasi said: “He is Thiqah”
[Bayaan al-Wahem wal Ayhaam: 3/364]

12-          Haafidh Ibn Hajar said: “He is Sadooq, sometimes he errs”
[Taqreeb: 3757]

Note: Such a narrator is Hasan ul-Hadeeth

Note: The authors of Tahreer Taqreeb at-Tahdheeb said: “He is Thiqah”

Haafidh Ibn Hajar also said: “He is declared Thiqah by the Majority (Akthar)”
[Hadi us-Saari: P. 457]

Those who criticized him:

1-    Imaam Bukhaari said: “He sometimes opposes in hadeeth”
[Al-Taareekh al-Kabeer by al-Bukhaari: 6/45; Ad-Du’afa al-Kabeer by al-Ukaylee: 3/41 T. 998; Al-Kaamil: 7/11-12]

Note: The Jarh “Laysa Biqawi” is not proven from Imaam Bukhaari.

2-    Imaam Abu Haatim ar-Raazi said, I asked (Imaam) Duhaym about him, whether you like him better or Waleed bin Mazeed? He said: “Ibn Abi al-Ishrayn is more beloved to me” I said: “Is Ibn Abi al-Ishrayn a man of Hadeeth? Thus he glanced at me i.e. (indicating) No!”
[Al-Jarh wat Ta’deel: Vol. 6 T. 49]

3-    Imaam Abu Haatim ar-Raazi said: “He was not a man of Hadeeth”
[Al-Jarh wat Ta’deel: Vol. 6 T. 49]

He is also reported to have said: “He is not strong”
[Tahdheeb al-Kamaal - This Jarh was not found with an authentic chain, wallahu a’lam]

4-    Imaam al-Ukaylee mentioned him in ad-Du’afa al-Kabeer
[3/41 T. 998]

5-    Imaam Nasaa’ee said: “He is not strong”
[Ad-Du’afa wal Matrokeen: 1/72]

6-    Haafidh Ibn al-Jawzee mentioned him ad-Du’afa wal Matrokeen
[2/85 T. 1824]

Conclusion:

Abdul Humayd bin Abi al-Ishrayn is Thiqah, Hasan ul-Hadeeth according to the Jumhoor.