Name:
أبو المهزم التميمى البصرى ، اسمه يزيد بن سفيان ، و قيل عبد الرحمن بن
سفيان
Abu
al-Muhazzim al-Tameemi al-Basri, his name is Yazeed bin Sufyaan, and it is
said: Abdur Rahmaan bin Sufyaan
Tabaqah:
3 - From the Middle Level of Taabi'een
Death: 111-120
H
Narrated by:
Abu Dawood –
Tirmidhi –
Ibn Maajah
Teachers: Abu
Hurayrah, Abu Moosa al-Ash’ari, Mu’aawiyah bin Abi Sufyaan (radiallah anhum)
and Muhammad bin Ka’b al-Madani
Students: Habeeb
al-Mu’allam, Harb bin Shurayh, Husayn al-Mu’allam, Hammaad bin Salamah, Shu’bah
bin al-Hajjaaj, Ghaalib al-Qattaan, and others.
Status:
Matrook, Accused of Fabricating
Opinions of Ahl ul-Jarh wat Ta’deel:
Those who criticized him:
1- Imaam Shu’bah bin al-Hajjaaj weakened him and abandoned him
[See, Sunan
at-Tirmidhi (1281), Ad-Du’afa al-Kabeer by al-Bukhaari (404), Al-Jarh wat Ta’deel
(9/269) and others]
Imaam Shu’bah
also said: “I saw Abu al-Muhazzim in the mosque
of Thaabit al-Bunaani forsaken (by others); had a person given him money, he
would have narrated to him seventy (i.e. many) narrations (i.e. by fabricating)”
[Tabaqaat
al-Kubra by Ibn Sa’d (7/177), Chain Saheeh]
Another
narration includes the wording: “Had a person
given him Dirham, he would have fabricated narrations”
[Al-Kaamil by
Ibn Adee (9/148)]
2-
Imaam
Amr bin Ali al-Fallaas (D. 249) said: “I
never heard Yahya (al-Qattaan) and Abdur Rahmaan (bin Mahdi) narrating anything
from Abu al-Muhazzim”
[
Al-Jarh wat Ta'deel by Ibn Abi Haatim (9/269), Chain Saheeh]
3-
Imaam
Ali bin Abdullah al-Madeeni (D. 234) said: “He
is Da’eef”
[
Su'aalaat Ibn Abi Shaybah Li-Ibn al-Madeeni (1/47 T. 2)]
4-
Imaam
Ahmed bin Hanbal (D. 241) said: “His
hadeeth is not close”
[
Al-Jarh wat Ta'deel by Ibn Abi Haatim (9/269), Chain Saheeh]
5-
Imaam
Yahya bin Ma’een (D. 233) said: “He is
Da’eef” and in another instance
he said: “He is nothing”
[
Al-Jarh wat Ta'deel by Ibn Abi Haatim (9/269), Chain Saheeh]
And in the
narration of Mu’aawiyah bin Saalih, Imaam Ibn Ma’een said: “His hadeeth is nothing”
[Ad-Du’afa
al-Kabeer by al-Ukaylee (4/383), Chain Saheeh]
6-
Imaam
Abu Zur’ah ar-Raazi (D. 264) said: “He
is not strong, Shu’bah has weakened him saying: I wrote hundred narrations from
him but I did not narrate anything from him, this was mentioned by Ali bin
al-Madeeni from Abdur Rahmaan”
[
Al-Jarh wat Ta'deel by Ibn Abi Haatim (9/269)]
7-
Imaam
Abu Haatim ar-Raazi (D. 275) said: “He
is Da’eef ul-Hadeeth”
[
Al-Jarh wat Ta'deel by Ibn Abi Haatim (9/269)]
8-
Imaam
Muhammad bin Ismaa’eel al-Bukhaari (D. 256) mentioned him in his book
of weak narrators and said: “Shu’bah has
abandoned him”
[
See, Al-Taareekh al-Kabeer by al-Bukhaari (8/339 T. 3235); and Du’afa
as-Sagheer by al-Bukhaari (404)]
9-
Imaam
Al-Nasaa’ee (D. 303) said: “He is
Matrook ul-Hadeeth”
[
Ad-Du'afa wal Matrokeen by al-Nasaa'ee (T. 648)]
10-
Imaam
Abu Ja’far al-Ukaylee (D. 322) mentioned him in his ad-Du’afa and said:
“His hadeeth is not followed”
[
Ad-Du'afa al-Kabeer by al-Ukaylee (4/383 T. 1996)]
11-
Imaam
Ibn Hibbaan (D. 354) mentioned him in al-Majroheen and said: “He is among those who would get confused and err in what
he narrated, so when he excelled in opposing the narrations of established
narrators, he went out of the boundary of Adaalah, and Shu’bah did indeed
abandon him”
[
Al-Majroheen by Ibn Hibbaan (3/99)]
12-
Imaam
Abu Ahmed bin Adee al-Jarjaani (D. 365) said: “And normally what he narrates is not preserved”
[
Al-Kaamil by Ibn Adee (9/150)]
13-
Imaam
Abu al-Hasan ad-Daaraqutni (D. 385) mentioned him in his book of weak
narrators and said: “Shu’bah has weakened him”
[
Ad-Du'afa wal Matrokeen by ad-Daaraqutni (591)]
In the
narration of al-Barqaani, Imaam ad-Daaraqutni said: “He
is abandoned”
[
Su'aalaat al-Barqaani li'd-Daaraqutni (552)]
14-
Imaam
Abu Abdullah al-Haakim al-Neesaaboori (D. 405) said: “He narrates Munkar narrations from Abu Hurayrah”
[
Al-Madkhal Ila as-Saheeh by al-Haakim (1/227)]
15-
Haafidh
Abu Nu’aym al-Asbahaani (D. 430) mentioned him in his ad-Du’afa and said:
“He narrated Munkar narrations from Abu Hurayrah”
[
Ad-Du'afa by Abu Nu'aym (1/160)]
16-
Haafidh
Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi (D. 456) said: “Abu
al-Muhazzim is severely weak”
[
Al-Muhalla bil Athaar by Ibn Hazm (7/496)]
17-
Imaam
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi (D. 458) said: “He
is Da’eef”
[
Sunan al-Kubra lil Bayhaqi (5/338 H. 10016)]
And in Shu’b
al-Eemaan, Al-Bayhaqi said: “And Abu al-Muhazzim
is Matrook”
[
Shu'b al-Eemaan by Bayhaqi (1/311 H. 150)]
18-
Haafidh
Ibn al-Jawzee (D. 597) declared a hadeeth to be Mawdoo (Fabricated)
due to the presence of Abu al-Muhazzim in it and said: “He Muttaham”
[
Al-Ilal al-Mutanaahiyah by Ibn al-Jawzee (1/380)]
At another
place, he said: “Abu al-Muhazzim is nothing”
[1/150]
19-
Haafidh
Sharf ud-Deen al-Nawawi (D. 676) weakened his hadeeth saying: “And it is Da’eef because of the weakness of Abu
al-Muhazzim”
[
Khulaasah al-Ahkaam by al-Nawawi (2/997)]
At another
place, Imaam Nawawi said: “He is Da’eef with the
agreement of all Muhadditheen”
[Al-Majmoo Sharh
al-Muhadhdhab by al-Nawawi (7/318, 7332)]
20-
Imaam
Shams ud-Deen adh-Dhahabi (D. 748) said: “They
have weakened him”
[
Meezaan al-I'tidaal by Dhahabi (4/426)]
At another
place, Imaam Dhahabi said: “He is Matrook”
[Tanqeeh
al-Tahqeeq by al-Dhahabi (2/10)]
21-
Haafidh
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani (D. 852) said: “He
is Matrook”
[
Taqreeb at-Tahdheeb by Ibn Hajar (8397)]
22-
Haafidh
Noor ud-Deen al-Haythami (D. 807) said: “He
is Matrook”
[
Majma az-Zawaaid by Al-Haythami (1/82)]
At another
place, he said: “He is weakened by Jumhoor”
[10/287]
Those who praised him:
None!!
Conclusion:
Abu al-Muhazzim is severely
weak, Matrook, and Accused of Fabricating according to the consensus of all
Muhadditheen.
No comments:
Post a Comment