Name:
إِسْمَاعِيل بن أبان الغنوي العامري، أَبُو إِسْحَاق الكوفي الخياط
Ismaa’eel bin Abaan al-Ghanawi al-Aamri, Abu
Ishaaq al-Koofi al-Khayyaat
Tabaqah: 9 – From
the Minor Taba Taabi’een
Death: 210 H
Teachers: Ismaa’eel
bin Abi Khaalid, Al-Hasan bin Ammaarah, Zakariyyah bin Abi Zaa’idah, Sufyaan
ath-Thawree, Sulemaan al-A’mash, Abdul Malik bin Abdul Azeez bin Jurayj, Abu
Khaalid Amr bin Khaalid al-Waasiti, Muhammad bin Ajlaan, Mis’ar bin Kidaam,
Hishaam bin Urwah and others.
Students: Ibraaheem
bin Sa’eed al-Johari, Ibraaheem bin Sulemaan al-Khazzaaz, Ahmed bin Haazim bin
Abi Gharzah, Ahmed bin Abdullah bin Yazeed al-Mu’addab, Ahmed bin Abdul A’la
ash-Shaybaani, Ahmed bin Yahya bin Zakariyyah as-Soofi, Ishaaq bin Ibraaheem
al-Baghawi, Sulemaan bin Dawood al-Shaazkooni, Abdullah bin al-Hasan
al-Haashmi, Abdur Rahmaan as-Siraaj, Ya’qoob bin Shaybah and others.
Status: Matrook,
Kadh-dhaab, Fabricator
Opinions of Ahl ul-Jarh wat
Ta’deel:
1-
Imaam Ahmed bin Hanbal said: “...Thus
we abandoned him”
[Al-Ilal by
Ahmed: 3/211]
2-
Imaam Yahya ibn Ma’een said: “He
fabricated a hadeeth from Fitr from Abu at-Tufayl from Ali, who said: The
seventh son from the children of Abbaas…”
[Al-Jarh wat
Ta’deel: 2/160]
Imaam Ibn
Ma’een also said: “He fabricated ahaadeeth on Sufyaan which were not his”
[Al-Majroheen
by Ibn Hibbaan: 1/128, Chain Saheeh]
3-
Imaam Bukhaari said: “He is
Matrook, Ahmed and the people have abandoned him”
[Al-Taareekh
al-Kabeer by al-Bukhaari: 1093, Al-Awsat by al-Bukhaari: 2/308, Taareekh
Baghdaad: 6/242]
4-
Imaam Muslim said: “He is
Matrook ul-Hadeeth”
[Al-Kunaa
wal Asmaa by Muslim: 1/44]
5-
Imaam Abu Zur’ah ar-Raazi said: “Abandon
his hadeeth”
[Al-Jarh wat
Ta’deel: 2/160]
6-
Imaam Abu Haatim ar-Raazi said: “He
is Matrook ul-Hadeeth, he is Kadh-dhaab (A Liar)”
[Al-Jarh wat
Ta’deel by Ibn Abi Haatim: 2/160]
7-
Imaam an-Nasaa’ee said: “He is
not Thiqah”
[Ad-Du’afa
wal Matrokeen: 284]
8-
Imaam Abu al-Hasan al-Ijlee said:
“He is Da’eef ul-Hadeeth… we met him but we did not write anything from him”
[Thiqaat by
al-Ijlee: 1/64]
9-
Imaam Ibraaheem bin Ya’qoob
al-Juzjaani said: “Lie is apparent in him”
[Ahwaal
ur-Rijaal by al-Juzjaani: P. 17-18]
10-
Imaam Ibn Hibbaan mentioned him
in al-Majroheen and said: “He used to fabricate hadeeth on the Thiqah
narrators”
[Al-Majroheen
by Ibn Hibbaan: 1/128]
11-
Imaam ad-Daaraqutni mentioned him
in ad-Du’afa
[75]
He also
said: “He is Da’eef”
[Sunan
ad-Daaraqutni: 1/329]
In his
Kitaab al-Jarh wat Ta’deel, he said: “He is Matrook ul-Hadeeth”
[Ikmaal
Tahdheeb al-Kamaal: 2/141, also see, Tahdheeb at-Tahdheeb]
12-
Imaam Ibn Adee said: “His
normal narrations are not followed whether with regard to Isnaad or Matn”
[Al-Kaamil:
1/503]
13-
Imaam Khateeb al-Baghdaadi said: “He
came to Baghdaad and narrated in it ahaadeeth; and people found out the lies in
them, thus they abstained from hearing narrations from him, and they discarded
the narrations narrated from him”
[Taareekh
Baghdaad: 6/240]
14-
Imaam Abu al-Hajjaaj al-Mizzi
said: “There is a unanimous consensus on his weakness”
[Tahdheeb
al-Kamaal by al-Mizzi: 3/12]
15-
Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah
said: “He is Kadh-dhaab (a Liar)”
[Majmoo
al-Fatawa: 1/262]
16-
Imaam Dhahabi said: “He is
Matrook”
[Al-Muqtani:
1/66; Deewaan ad-Du’afa: 1/30]
Imaam
Dhahabi also said: “He is Kadh-dhaab (A Liar)”
[Siyar A’laam
al-Nabula: 10/348]
17-
Haafidh Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani
said: “He is Matrook, he is accused of fabricating (ahaadeeth)”
[Taqreeb:
411]
18-
Haafidh al-Haythami said: “He
is Matrook”
[Majma
az-Zawaaid: 2/152]
No comments:
Post a Comment